Understanding Care (Coventry) Limited (21 017 651)

Category : Adult care services > Domiciliary care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jun 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about advice Mr X says the Care Provider gave his mother. Mr X did not experience a significant injustice.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Care Provider that looks after his mother handled a disagreement between him and his brother badly, acting in a biased way towards his brother. It gave their mother advice which led to Mr X and his brother having joint and several Lasting Power of Attorney. It stopped sending invoices to Mr X.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X and his brother disagree about their mother’s capacity to decide who should act as Lasting Power of Attorney. Mr X complained to the Ombudsman about the actions of the Care Provider. He says it advised his mother to reinstate his brother as joint attorney after she had made a decision, with capacity, to revoke this.
  2. There is no evidence we would find Mr X experienced a significant injustice if we investigated his complaint, which is in his own right and not on his mother’s behalf. Mr X indicates he has suffered stress. However, if there was any significant injustice caused by the issues, it was his mother who experienced it.
  3. I do not have Mr X’s mother’s consent to consider a complaint on her behalf, so I have not considered any impact the alleged fault had on her. Should Mr X wish to bring a complaint with his mother’s consent, he will need to make a separate complaint to us within 12 months of the issues he complains about.
  4. Mr X or his brother should approach the Office of the Public Guardian and the Court of Protection if they wish to raise issues about each other’s suitability to act as their mother’s attorney, for confirmation of whether their mother can make a decision and what is in her best interests if she cannot. These are decisions the Ombudsman could not make.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he did not experience a significant injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings