Bluebird Care (Bournemouth & Poole) (19 010 717)

Category : Adult care services > Domiciliary care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Dec 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the outcome of her complaint about a carer. This is because it is unlikely we could add to the response already provided via the care provider’s investigation. Also, the Ombudsman cannot consider disciplinary matters.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Miss X, complains about the care provider’s response to her complaint after a carer swore at her. Miss X is unhappy with the outcome of the disciplinary investigation as the carer was issued with a written warning.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We can decide whether to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about adult social care providers. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the care provider, or
  • it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 34B(8) and (9))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Miss X provided in her complaint. I also considered the complaint correspondence which we requested from the care provider. I sent Miss X a draft copy of my decision and invited her comments on it.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Miss X complained to the care provider after her domiciliary carer swore at her.
  2. The care provider investigated and apologised for the carer’s actions. It did not charge Miss X for the two visits relevant to the complaint and ensured the carer would not visit Miss X again. The carer was asked to provide a written apology to Miss X and the care provider ensured this was sent.
  3. The care provider started a disciplinary investigation and, as a result, the carer was issued with a formal written warning. The care provider says this was decided in line with its polices and took account of the fact this was an out of character, first offence.
  4. Mrs X is dissatisfied with the outcome of the disciplinary action and, as a result, does not think her complaint was taken seriously.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because it is unlikely an investigation by the Ombudsman could add to the response already provided by the care provider’s investigation.
  2. We cannot consider, or recommend, disciplinary action. Such matters lie outside our remit. Nor can we consider whether the disciplinary action it took in relation to the carer is reasonable. However, it is clear from the care provider’s response that it has taken Miss X’s complaint seriously and has acted to try to remedy this.

 

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings