Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council (18 015 872)

Category : Adult care services > Domiciliary care

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 25 Aug 2020

Summary: Mr X complains on behalf of his late parents. He says the Council did not properly consider the risks of separating them after 59 years of marriage or of Mr Y living on his own. He complains about the quality of care it provided to them both and says it did not deal adequately with his concerns and complaints. He also complained that the safeguarding process was flawed, and the Council would not give him a copy of Mr Y’s assessment.

Finding

The Ombudsman upheld the complaint and found fault causing injustice.

Recommendations

To remedy the injustice caused, we recommend the Council:

  • apologise to Mr X and Ms Z setting out the faults identified in this report and the action the Council will take, or has taken, to put this right;
  • pay Mr X and Ms Z £750 each to recognise the distress it caused in failing to properly consider the risks of separating Mr and Mrs Y;
  • pay Mr X a further £500 for the time and trouble and distress he was caused in bringing his complaint;
  • review any cases where couples are separated by their care needs, to ensure the risks and human rights were fully considered for both parties. Also, that adequate contact is included on the care and support plans;
  • review assessment practice across the Council to ensure it is consistent and Care Act compliant. It should do this using the quality measures and reporting processes it has implemented since these events;
  • ensure it has an effective mechanism for following up where complaints about poor practice have been received and to check that improvements are made and sustained;
  • put in measures to ensure complaints about several agencies receive a coordinated response; and
  • review its commissioning practice when services are rated “Requires improvement” to ensure it considers any increased risk to people.

Ombudsman satisfied with Council's response: 25 November 2020.

 

Print this page