South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council (24 022 089)

Category : Adult care services > Disabled facilities grants

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 10 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We uphold this complaint that the Council used another process rather than the statutory procedure for complaints about children’s services to respond to Mrs X’s complaint. The Council has agreed to resolve the matter by providing a suitable remedy for the injustice caused to Mrs X.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X said the Council had used another process rather than the statutory procedure for complaints about children’s services in response to her complaint.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. If there has been fault which has caused an injustice, we may suggest a remedy. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1) and 26A(1), as amended)
  2. Under the information sharing agreement between the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman and the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted), we will share this decision with Ofsted.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council, and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  2. I have not considered the substantive matter Mrs X complained of. She is welcome to return to us if this matter is not resolved to both parties’ satisfaction by the Council via the statutory complaints procedure for children’s complaints.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained to the Council regarding alleged delay in deciding and completing works for adaptations to her property under a disabled facilities grant. These are intended to benefit her child. The complaint falls to be considered under the statutory procedure for complaints about children’s services. Mrs X complained to the Ombudsman that the Council had failed to deal with her complaint.
  2. Mrs X has shown that she complained to the Council, and that it responded via the complaints process for adult social care.
  3. If we were to investigate it is likely we would find fault causing Mrs X injustice, in that the Council failed to address her complaint via the correct process, delaying resolution of the matter.

Back to top

Agreed action

  1. We invited the Council to immediately start an investigation of Mrs X’s complaint at Stage 2 of the statutory procedure. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint by doing so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Mrs X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings