Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (25 011 875)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled facilities grants 22-Dec-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an assessment by the Council’s adult social care department for adaptations to a property. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council in the way it made its decision. So, we cannot challenge the decision even though the complainant disagrees with it.
-
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council (25 000 377)
Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 19-Dec-2025
Summary: Mr X complained about how the Council completed the Disabled Facilities Grant (DFG) process and works to his home. Mr X said this impacted his finances and mental health. There was fault in the way the Council delayed making a payment, has not recorded communications and its complaint handling was poor. This distressed Mr X. The Council agreed to apologise and make the financial payment it offered.
-
Nuneaton & Bedworth Borough Council (25 014 158)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled facilities grants 19-Dec-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mr X’s disagreement with the Council over adaptations to his home under the Disabled Facilities Grant scheme. This is because further investigation is unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.
-
Bracknell Forest Council (25 008 901)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled facilities grants 18-Dec-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint the Council refused a relocation grant. There is not enough evidence of fault in how it reached its decision to justify our involvement.
-
Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council (25 010 653)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled facilities grants 17-Dec-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a Disabled Facilities Grant. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault.
-
Suffolk County Council (25 003 045)
Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 11-Dec-2025
Summary: There was a delay in offering Mr B an assessment by an occupational therapist, to decide whether Mr B was eligible for a disabled facilities grant (DFG) but the Council has already remedied this. The Council failed to properly consider its duties under the Armed Forces Covenant when it made its decision and this was fault. The Council has agreed to review its decision and provide a written response to Mr B.
-
Lancaster City Council (25 010 007)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled facilities grants 11-Dec-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about how the Council responded to her concerns about her wet room. This is because her complaint is late and there is no good reason to exercise discretion to consider it now.
-
Reading Borough Council (25 010 016)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled facilities grants 10-Dec-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Miss B’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her Disabled Facilities Grant application. This is because it is unlikely our involvement would lead to a different outcome.
-
Hampshire County Council (25 004 787)
Statement Not upheld Disabled facilities grants 08-Dec-2025
Summary: Miss X complains the Council has not properly assessed her needs. We have not investigated because the Council has offered Miss X a fresh assessment and further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.
-
London Borough of Brent (24 018 904)
Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 04-Dec-2025
Summary: Mrs B complains about the Council’s assessment of her son’s eligibility for a disabled facilities grant. We have found fault sa there was a delay in the provision of adaptations which have still not been provided and there was fault in the decision-making process. The Council has agreed to review the decision, pay a financial remedy and carry out a service improvement.