Suffolk County Council (23 004 516)

Category : Adult care services > Disabled facilities grants

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Aug 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council noting inaccurate information in a letter. She says the Council stated she had a walk-in shower when she does not. This is because an investigation would not lead to different findings or outcomes.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council noted inaccurate information in a letter as it stated she had a walk-in shower when she does not. Miss X says she has a bath.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • it would be reasonable for the person to ask for an organisation review or appeal.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In response to Miss X’s complaint, the Council apologised for incorrectly recording Miss X had a walk-in shower. The Council confirmed it would amend this information in its assessment.
  2. An investigation is not justified as it would not lead to any different findings as the Council has already accepted it was at fault for the incorrect information recorded. Further, an investigation would not lead to a different outcome as the Council has completed an appropriate remedy by apologising for the mistake and amending the information.
  3. In addition, the Council told us that following its complaint response, Miss X’s advocate requested the Council reassess Miss X’s care and support needs. The Council said this work was ongoing. Therefore, it is reasonable for the Council to be given the opportunity to complete its reassessment. If Miss X is unhappy with the outcome of the reassessment, it is open to her to make a new complaint to the Council.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because an investigation would not lead to different findings or outcomes.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings