Birmingham City Council (22 008 871)

Category : Adult care services > Disabled facilities grants

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Dec 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage to property because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. The Council’s insurers are the appropriate body to decide a claim for damage, not the Ombudsman.

The complaint

  1. Ms B says the Council damaged her shower and is not doing anything to put the matter right. Ms B is stressed and wants the matter resolved.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council completed works to Ms B’s bathroom under a Disabled Facilities Grant. Ms B says it damaged her shower.
  2. The Council has provided a detailed response to Ms B’s complaints, and it is unlikely the Ombudsman could add to that.
  3. The Council visited Ms B’s home and agreed a list of outstanding works which it will arrange for completion by a different contractor. The Council says it is waiting for Ms B’s agreement so it can arrange the works. I do not know whether the shower is included in those works but if it is then the Council has taken appropriate action to resolve Ms B’s concern.
  4. Where a council, or a contractor on its behalf, might be responsible for damages to someone’s property the appropriate way to decide that would be through the council’s insurers. So, if the shower is not included on the outstanding list of works Ms B can make a claim on the Council’s insurance for damage to her property.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms B’s complaint because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. The Council has appropriately dealt with Ms B’s complaint and is awaiting her agreement to complete outstanding works. If the shower is not part of those outstanding works the Council’s insurers would be the appropriate body to decide a claim for damages, not the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings