West Sussex County Council (25 013 442)

Category : Adult care services > Direct payments

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a Council decision that it will no longer accept his relative, Ms Y, as his advocate during his adult social care support planning and reviews. There is insufficient evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about a Council decision that it will no longer accept his relative, Ms Y, as his advocate during his adult social care support planning and reviews. He says the decision has caused distress and the Council is not respecting his choice. He wants the Council to allow Ms Y to continue to act as his formal advocate.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Councils must ensure that any individual acting in a representative or advocacy role is free from any conflict of interest that might compromise their ability to represent a person’s wishes impartially. Where there is no appropriate individual available to support the person’s wishes, the Council must arrange an independent advocate.
  2. In its complaint response, the Council said that Ms Y has a financial and managerial interest in a service that it commissions for Mr X as part of his care and support package. It said this was a clear conflict of interest between her responsibility as Mr X’s relative and her interest as a service provider. For this reason, it could not accept her as Mr X’s advocate.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. Regulations and statutory guidance set out that an individual cannot act as a person’s representative for the purpose of care and support planning, if the individual is involved in providing care or treatment to that person. Ms Y has a professional interest in providing Mr X’s care and support. The Council’s decision that she is not a suitable advocate for Mr X appears in line with the regulations and statutory guidance. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings