Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (25 007 772)

Category : Adult care services > Direct payments

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council withholding information from a Care Company. This is because the Information Commissioner Office would be best placed to consider this complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mr X said the Council withheld information needed to reconcile a deceased Client’s finances to determine outstanding fees. He said it relied on data protection legislation inappropriately and the Care Company are owed a significant amount of money.
  2. Mr X said the Council advised the Company to pursue the estate for the debt. He wants the Council to provide information about how the Client used their direct payment funds.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended.)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. The Council explained to Mr X that the Client accepted responsibility for managing the direct payment funds under its direct payment agreement.
  2. The Council confirmed the Client’s direct payments were used to pay the Company and the funds in the direct payment account had been exhausted meaning no further invoices could be paid. It also said the Client’s financial information is not needed to calculate any outstanding balance.
  3. If Mr X is unhappy with information shared by the Council and believes it has applied data protection legislation incorrectly, that would be matter for the ICO.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings