Sheffield City Council (25 005 813)

Category : Adult care services > Direct payments

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr S’s complaint about the Council’s management of Ms X’s direct payments account. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to result in a different result.

The complaint

  1. Mr S complained on Ms X’s behalf that there are variances between her and sibling Ms T’s direct payments account.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr S and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr S complained to the Council regarding Ms X and her sibling Ms T’s direct payments accounts. He said the Council changed Ms T’s care and support plan and removed direct payments from her account without consulting with them.
  2. The Council acknowledged that it had not acted in line with the correct process and offered Mr S a meeting to discuss Ms X and Ms T’s direct payments accounts along with a fresh care assessment.
  3. Mr S remains unhappy with the Council’s actions. Ms T’s complaint is being investigated by the Ombudsman separately. The evidence does not show the Council has mismanaged Ms X’s account. The Council has offered reasonable actions to ensure Ms X’s account is in order. An investigation into this matter would be unlikely to provide a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr S’s complaint because an investigation would be unlikely to result in a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings