Norfolk County Council (24 003 426)

Category : Adult care services > Direct payments

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about matters relating to her direct payment. This is because the Council has offered to carry out a reassessment of Mrs X’s needs in order to consider the issues raised further and it is reasonable to expect Mrs X to complete this process before we will consider her complaint.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mrs X, complains about matters relating to her direct payment budget. She complains the Council has delayed in considering her complaint; has taken over her direct payment; is not providing all the care hours she needs; has failed to implement her last assessment; has not obtained relevant information from other key agencies and has not properly considered her needs and circumstances.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We do not start an investigation if we decide it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained to the Council about matters relating to her direct payment in early 2024.
  2. In response, the Council told Mrs X it had allocated her case to a new officer and that it would carry out a reassessment of her needs.
  3. Mrs X says assessments are distressing and she does not want to have to go through another one.
  4. The Council says it has not been able to progress the matter further and consider whether Mrs X needs the additional hours claimed because Mrs X has, so far, declined the reassessment.
  5. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint at this time. This is because the Council has offered to carry out a further reassessment to enable it to reach a view on the issues raised and it is reasonable to expect Mrs X to engage with this process before we consider her complaint. Whilst I acknowledge Mrs X finds assessments distressing, this approach offers the best opportunity to resolve the issues raised in her complaint. We cannot assess her needs. It is a matter for the Council.
  6. If Mrs X remains dissatisfied with the outcome of the reassessment, once the Council has reached its final decision, then it will be open to her to resubmit a complaint to this office.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. This is because it is reasonable to expect Mrs X to first engage with the Council’s offer to carry out a reassessment.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings