Royal Borough of Greenwich (23 003 486)

Category : Adult care services > Direct payments

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 23 Oct 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Councils failure to tell Ms B direct payments she receives for providing care to her employer, Mr C, would include his National Insurance contribution and holiday payments. This is because the Council has apologised for the fault, and we are satisfied this remedies the injustice caused.

The complaint

  1. Ms B complained she agreed with the Council to provide Mr C with care through a direct payment of £537.05 a week but only received £487.50. Ms B says the Council misled her and did not explain the direct payment was before deductions. Ms B wants the Council to repay the money she was told she would receive.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council apologised communication was not as good as it should have been and explained the breakdown of her employers, Mr C’s, personal budget, the deductions incurred by his National Insurance contribution, and payments for holidays. It acknowledged this had not been properly explained to her and clarified the difference between the gross direct payment rate and the net rate Ms B receives from her employer.
  2. The Council has explained the reasons for the gross and net rates and apologised for the lack of communication. We could not add to this or make a different finding even if we investigated.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms B’s complaint because the Council has apologised for the fault, and we are satisfied this remedies to injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings