City of Wolverhampton Council (25 008 175)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mrs X being charged at a private rate for residential home care received. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our further involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X said the Council failed to advise properly when he was incapacitated and his wife Mrs X required residential care because he could not look after her. He said the Council was wrong to regard charges before January 2025 as private, and should backdate the financial assessment to the date she entered the care home, not the date he was able to contact it.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Having seen the Council’s response to Mr X’s complaint, I asked it for a copy of its records for the period concerned when the care was first needed. These recorded the Council told Mr X’s family the financial implications of arranging residential care privately rather than going via the financial assessment route, given the family had said that Mr X’s wife’s savings were likely to be below the financial threshold for full contribution. It also recorded the family asked the Council not to continue to contact it about respite care. The care provided would thus have been charged by the home privately at the full rate until the family contacted the Council in January 2025 to request a financial assessment.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our further involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings