Kent County Council (23 006 700)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Oct 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council charging Ms X’s father for his care and support. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault..

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains about the Council charging her father for his care and support. She says her father worried about the cost of care and continuously asked the Council about the cost. She also complains the financial assessment completed for her father is wrong.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X’s father, Mr B, received care and support in his home. Initially, Mr B was not charged for the care services he received as it was reablement care.
  2. In April 2023, the Council reviewed Mr B’s care needs. The review determined Mr B needed long term care and support. Evidence shows the Council visited Mr B twice in April to discuss the care he needed and confirmed the care and support services would be chargeable.
  3. Mr B was also provided with a letter which detailed he would be charged from the day he first receives care and that this was likely to be before his financial assessment was completed. Mr B signed this letter confirming he had received a copy of the letter.
  4. The Council confirmed none of its officers had any concerns about Mr B’s mental capacity during the visits. Mr B also confirmed he managed his finances independently.
  5. An investigation is not justified as there is insufficient evidence of fault. The Council provided clear information to Mr B regarding the fact his care and support would be chargeable following a financial assessment. The Council is entitled to charge for care and support services under the Care Act 2014.
  6. The Council has also confirmed it recently completed a new financial assessment for Mr B as it was determined he needed long term residential care. If Ms X is not happy with the outcome of this financial assessment, she should make a new complaint to the Council. She can then bring the new complaint to us to consider if she is unhappy with the Council’s response.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings