Essex County Council (22 011 140)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 21 Dec 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about deprivation of assets to avoid care charges. That is because we are satisfied with the action the Council has agreed to take.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council did not properly consider the evidence she provided when it decided the money her mother, Ms Y gifted her was a deprivation of assets. She said that had caused her stress and worry. She wants the Council to accept deprivation of assets has not occurred.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. If we investigated this complaint, it is likely we would find the Council at fault. That is because we expect to see councils offering a right of review or appeal to any decision where it believes someone has intentionally deprived themselves of capital. That can be done through either the complaints process or an appeals procedure.
  2. Following a financial assessment, the Council wrote to Mrs X with its decision the money Ms Y gifted her was a deprivation of asset. Mrs X complained and set out reasons why she disagreed. The Council sent a complaint response, but this did not address the points she made.
  3. We therefore asked the Council to consider remedying the injustice caused by its actions by:
    • Reviewing its decision and responding to the points Mrs X raised in her review request.
    • Reminding staff that when responding to complaints about deprivation of asset decisions they should respond to points of dispute and set out reasons why the decision is upheld or not upheld.
  1. To its credit the Council agreed to resolve the complaint and will do the above within four weeks of my final decision to put things right.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Mrs X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings