Royal Borough of Greenwich (22 011 075)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 10 Mar 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mrs C complains about the domiciliary care provided to her father. Mrs C says her mother suffered avoidable distress and her father did not receive all the care due and she spent unnecessary time and trouble in pursuing the matter. We have ended our investigation as the Council’s proposed actions of cancelling the outstanding charges and symbolic payments for both distress and time and trouble provide a suitable remedy.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Mrs C, complains about the domiciliary care provided to her father, Mr X. In particular, Mrs C complains the Council failed to:
      1. provide timely information about the costs of Mr X’s care;
      2. provide a copy of Mr X’s care and support plan; and
      3. properly investigate and take appropriate action in response to her reports about the quality of the care provided.
  2. Mrs C says because of the Council’s fault, her mother suffered avoidable distress about financial matters during an already difficult time and her father did not receive all the care due. Mrs C also says she has spent unnecessary time and trouble in pursuing the matter.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I read the papers provided by Mrs C and discussed the complaint with her. I have considered some information from the Council which is set out in this statement. I have explained my draft decision to Mrs C and the Council and provided an opportunity for comment.

Back to top

What I found

  1. During the course of my investigation, the Council proposed the following to provide a remedy for Mrs C’s complaint:
  • the cancellation of the outstanding non-residential charges which currently amount to £2,045.28;
  • a symbolic payment of £300 to acknowledge Mrs C’s mother’s avoidable distress; and
  • a symbolic payment of £300 to acknowledge Mrs C’s time and trouble.
  1. I have also considered the Council’s previous apology to Mrs C about this matter.
  2. The Council’s proposed action above together with the previously provided apology is in line with the Ombudsman’s Guidance on Remedies.
  3. Based on the information provided, I am satisfied the Council’s proposed actions above provide a suitable remedy and further investigation by the Ombudsman would not achieve a better outcome for Mrs C.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have ended my investigation as I am satisfied the Council’s proposed actions provide a suitable remedy and further investigation by the Ombudsman would not achieve a better outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings