Kent County Council (19 010 502)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Dec 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about residential care charges from 2014 - 2015. The complaint is late, and I do not see good reasons to exercise discretion to investigate now.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about residential care charges for his late mother’s care going back to 2014 – 2015. He says his mother should not have been charged.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the information provided by Mr X. I sent him my draft decision and read the information he supplied.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Some people who have been in hospital under s117 of the Mental Health Act (MHA) can get free after care. This can include accommodation costs where the need for accommodation is identified as a need arising from the mental condition causing the detention.
  2. Mr X informed the Council in 2015 that his mother was entitled to free after care to cover care charges from 2014 - 2015 as she was sectioned in 1998. The Council refused his request (stating the need for residential care could not be directly linked to the mental condition arising in the 1998 detention).
  3. In September 2019 Mr X complained to us.
  4. We will not investigate. Mr X has complained to us 4 years after he knew about the matters he is now raising.
  5. Furthermore, I can see from the information Mr X provided that the Council signposted him to the Ombudsman in September 2013 (regarding a different complaint matter). So, it was reasonable to expect him to complain to us in 2015 rather than over 4 years later. I see no good reasons for us to exercise discretion to investigate now.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate as the complaint has been made late and there are no good reasons to exercise our discretion.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings