London Borough of Haringey (25 026 240)

Category : Adult care services > Assessment and care plan

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the care and support provided by the Council and direct payments. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council has not provided the support required to meet her needs and tried to force her to accept direct payments for her to arrange her own support.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. A council has a duty to arrange care and support for those with eligible needs. A council can choose to charge for non-residential care following a person’s needs assessment.
  2. In its complaint response, the Council confirmed it had discussed direct payments with her during its assessment of her needs. It said it respected her decision to decline this option.
  3. It has told us that it completed a Care Act needs assessment with Ms X in October 2025, which identified that she had eligible care needs. It said Ms X declined support with personal care or meal preparation at that time and told the Council she would re-consider this, once ongoing housing adaptations were complete. It said it did arrange for a cleaning service for Ms X but she later asked for this to stop, as she told the Council she could not afford her assessed personal contribution.
  4. It reviewed Ms X’s care and support again in March 2026. The review identified that Ms X had eligible care and support needs. It said Ms X did ask the Council again for support with cleaning but then later declined the service, saying that she could not afford the assessed personal contribution.
  5. We will not investigate this complaint. I have seen no evidence the Council forced Ms X to accept direct payments or that a direct payment arrangement was put in place against her wishes. The Council agreed to provide three-monthly cleaning support for Ms X, and it was Ms X’s decision to decline this. Although I acknowledge Ms X’s view that she declined the support because she could not afford to pay her assessed contribution, the law allows councils to ask a person to pay towards the cost of their care. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings