What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

London Borough of Havering (25 021 463)

Category : Adult care services > Assessment and care plan

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the outcome of the Council’s care and support assessment for Mr X. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains on behalf of Mr X, that the Council has wrongly removed some support it was providing to him following an assessment of his needs.
  2. She says the Council has caused financial hardship and significant distress. She would like the Council to reassess Mr X’s needs and her needs as his carer.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council carried out an assessment of Mr X’s needs in October 2025 and decided it would no longer provide 15 hours of Personal Assistant support to help Mr X with social inclusion.
  2. It said Mr X told the Council he did not leave the house regularly and could manage his daily life without support, so the 15 hours of direct payments were not needed for the intended purpose.
  3. Ms X complained as she said this will put more pressure on her and make it difficult for her to go to work as she cannot leave Mr X alone.
  4. The Council explained the reasoning for its decision about Mr X’s needs, and advised about medical support he may want to seek.
  5. It also confirmed it would carry out a new assessment of Ms X’s needs as a carer.
  6. The Council has made a decision it is entitled to make about Mr X’s support, and has already offered to assess Ms X’s needs to consider the support she may need.
  7. Further investigation by this office is unlikely to lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence the Council is at fault to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings