Derbyshire County Council (22 002 333)

Category : Adult care services > Assessment and care plan

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Jun 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council completed Mr X’s care needs assessment. Further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mrs Y complained on behalf of her father, Mr X. She said the Council included inaccurate information in Mr X’s care needs assessment and failed to properly obtain his views. Mrs Y said that Mr X has a right to have a fair an accurate assessment. She believes the Council has not fully responded to her concerns in its complaint response.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement,
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs Y complained to the Council after she received a copy of Mr X’s care needs assessment. She said the assessment contained Mr X’s views, but the Council had not met with him to get these. She also said Mr X had dementia and as Lasting Power of Attorney she needed to be included in any meeting around his care and support needs.
  2. In the Council’s complaint responses, it explained it had sent her a draft copy of Mr X’s care needs assessment. It said it had prepopulated some information in that assessment ahead of a planned face-to-face meeting. It said that meeting was cancelled because Mrs Y was unwell. It subsequently completed a meeting virtually with the support of the care home. It accepted it should have met with her after that review to discuss the assessment however it had not affected the outcome of the assessment. The Council said it had provided Mrs Y a final amended assessment
  3. We will not investigate Mrs Y’s complaint further. Although Mrs Y says the Council has failed to accurately record Mr X’s views in his assessment, there is no evidence that he has suffered a significant injustice or that his care and support needs are not met. In addition, the Council has issued an amended assessment. Although Mrs Y has unanswered questions of the Council, it is not the Ombudsman’s role to answer these. The Council has responded to her complaint and explained what happened. Further investigation by the Ombudsman would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs Y’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of injustice and further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings