Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council (17 017 535)

Category : Adult care services > Assessment and care plan

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 03 Jun 2019

Summary: A woman complains about the lack of support she received to recruit a personal assistant, and about an assessment by the Council which reduced her support by over 60%.

Finding

The Ombudsman upheld the complaint and found fault causing injustice.

Recommendations

We welcome the Council’s agreement to our recommendations to:

  • apologise to Ms X in writing, and in an accessible format, setting out the faults we have identified and detailing the action it will take to put this right;
  • pay Ms X £3,800 to acknowledge the significant and avoidable harm, distress, time and trouble it caused when it failed to provide sufficient support and repeatedly failed to listen to what she said;
  • pay Ms X’s longstanding, day time personal assistant, £500 in recognition of the unpaid, and on demand support she provided in the absence of other support;
  • reinstate the personal budget for 67 hours immediately, pending reassessment;
  • an experienced social worker with knowledge and understanding of sight loss to reassess Ms X’s needs. Also, complete a Continuing Health Care checklist
  • assessment and request a joint assessment with health;
  • discuss with Ms X, and ensure the Council’s records note, suitable reasonable adjustments for Ms X;
  • review the services provided by agency B, to consider:
    • complaints handling, and whether verbal complaints are captured;
    • response times and prioritisation;
    • the quality and timeliness of the information it provides to individuals needing to recruit personal assistants; and
    • the quality of the advice it provides about arranging care from agencies in the absence of a personal assistant.
  • review cases over the past 12 months where people with complex needs have complained about reductions in budgets, to ensure the reviews were in line with Care Act requirements;
  • take action to ensure all assessments, reviews and support plans are completed in line with the Care Act in future. In particular, to ensure:
    • the person’s view is the starting point where possible;
    • the assessment considers fluctuating needs, how to prevent needs developing or escalating, and takes a holistic approach;
    • people have the opportunity to comment on the assessment.
  • review its complaints process and take action to ensure responses to complaints are effective.

Ombudsman satisfied with Council's response: 11 August 2020

Print this page