Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 53256 results

  • Isle of Wight Council (25 002 747)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council processed and considered a planning application and investigated reports of breaches of planning control. We have not seen enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to justify an investigation.

  • Cornwall Council (25 000 944)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Charging 21-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council's decision not to disregard the value of her mother’s property. The complaint is late and there are no good reasons to investigate now. In any case, there is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making to justify our involvement.

  • London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (25 000 999)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 21-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s safeguarding enquiry after an incident involving day centre staff. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s decision not to progress to formal enquiries, and insufficient evidence any fault by the Council in other areas caused a significant injustice.

  • London Borough of Enfield (25 001 191)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Homelessness 21-Jul-2025

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to consider his review request about its homelessness decisions. He said he had no accommodation because of the Council’s actions. We have ended our investigation as the complaint is outside the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction. Mr X should complete the Council review and if he disagrees with the decision, it is reasonable for him to appeal to the County Court.

  • North Lincolnshire Council (25 001 198)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 21-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to complete a review of historic council tax accounts. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation. We have already considered and decided a complaint about historic council tax accounts so cannot investigate again.

  • Worcestershire County Council (25 001 348)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 21-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint that her son, B, failed to make progress at school. We do not have the expertise to assess whether he made as much progress as could be expected so we cannot achieve the outcome Ms M wants. The Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider Ms M’s complaint about the reasons the Council recorded for the breakdown of B’s school placement.

  • Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council (25 001 361)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway repair and maintenance 21-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about highway maintenance because the courts and insurers are better placed to consider the complaint.

  • Stoke-on-Trent City Council (25 001 463)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 21-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions relating to Mr X’s car. Mr X has an alternative legal remedy to pursue action through the courts and it would be reasonable to expect him to do so.

  • Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (25 005 567)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 21-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council not responding to her subject access request. It is more appropriate for the Information Commissioner’s Office to consider her complaint.

  • London Borough of Harrow (25 006 220)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 21-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss C’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her housing application. This is because the information indicates the Council has assessed Miss C’s priority in line with the Council’s housing allocations scheme. The Council has apologised for providing wrong information to Miss C. This was a suitable response and an investigation is not justified.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings