Archive has 15 results
-
City of York Council (22 015 819)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway adoption 17-Mar-2023
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council wrongly considered that a road it adopted in 2021 previously had full highway rights and therefore can be used by motorised vehicles. This is because further investigation would not reach a meaningful outcome.
-
London Borough of Hounslow (22 011 921)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway adoption 10-Jan-2023
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the condition of a footpath where the complainant lives. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. It is reasonable to expect the complainant to pursue a court remedy.
-
City of York Council (22 011 393)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway adoption 19-Dec-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council has dealt with matters relating to the adoption of a road outside the complainant’s property. This is because we have previously considered a complaint about the Council’s claim that the road was adopted. Other matters raised by the complainant are either made late or have been subject to the commencement of court proceedings.
-
London Borough of Havering (22 010 342)
Statement Upheld Highway adoption 23-Nov-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse the complainant’s application for a dropped kerb. There is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council considered her application. There is fault in the delay in its response to the complainant, however we consider the Council’s apology to be a suitable remedy on this point.
-
Swindon Borough Council (22 010 601)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway adoption 04-Nov-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council introducing a new traffic layout. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.
-
Cheshire East Council (22 007 972)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway adoption 26-Oct-2022
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council has failed to provide information about the legal status and width of a track near his property. Investigation will not add to the Council’s actions. It has supplied information via its ‘highway extent’ service. Mr X can reasonably use his legal remedies if he wishes to claim damage to his property or dispute the extent of the highway.
-
West Sussex County Council (22 009 272)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway adoption 25-Oct-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse an application for a disabled parking bay. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.
-
Royal Borough of Greenwich (22 008 683)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway adoption 18-Oct-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse the complainants application for two dropped kerbs outside his home. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant our involvement.
-
Hinckley & Bosworth Borough Council (22 007 000)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway adoption 14-Sep-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s delay in determining a planning application for a vehicle crossing. It was reasonable for Ms X to appeal to the Planning Inspectorate to seek a determination once the timescale for a decision was exceeded.
-
Cheshire East Council (22 004 705)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway adoption 25-Jul-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to provide Miss X with a map of areas it maintains at public expense. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.