Archive has 157 results
-
Birmingham City Council (21 009 833)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 12-Nov-2021
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s complaint handling and the effectiveness of a Traffic Regulation Order. This is because any injustice is not significant enough to warrant our investigation, the ICO is better placed to consider complaints about freedom of information and it is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaint handling alone.
-
Gloucestershire County Council (21 009 367)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 12-Nov-2021
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about delay in processing a Traffic Regulation Order for parking restrictions. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.
-
Devon County Council (21 001 085)
Statement Not upheld Traffic management 11-Nov-2021
Summary: Mr X complained about how the Council decided not to reduce the speed limit or implement traffic calming measures on a road near his house. The Council was not at fault.
-
London Borough of Merton (21 005 845)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 11-Nov-2021
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to introduce weekend parking restrictions in an existing Controlled Parking Zone. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council and it is unlikely we could add anything to the Council’s response.
-
Cheshire East Council (21 009 179)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 10-Nov-2021
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about traffic management. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our investigation.
-
East Riding of Yorkshire Council (21 008 946)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 08-Nov-2021
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to re-instate road studs which were removed from the highway during resurfacing works. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.
-
Buckinghamshire Council (21 009 154)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 02-Nov-2021
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Councils decision to reduce the length of the thirty-mile speed limit on the main road through the complainant’s village. We are unlikely to find fault in the process the Council followed leading to the decision.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 01-Nov-2021
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about heavy goods vehicles using Mrs X’s road. There is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council, installing more signs would not necessarily stop the HGVs using that road, and enforcement is not the Council’s role.
-
Telford & Wrekin Council (21 000 340)
Statement Not upheld Traffic management 01-Nov-2021
Summary: There is no fault in the Council’s installation of a traffic calming scheme. Mrs X says the speed bump placement causes more noise, but the Council has explained that it is at an angle due to the curve of the road and it does not intend to amend the scheme. The Council’s intention to place bark on a strip of land next to the pavement is a satisfactory response to complaints about maintaining the area.
-
Devon County Council (21 000 675)
Statement Not upheld Traffic management 01-Nov-2021
Summary: Mrs M says the Council did not make the necessary investigations and enquiries before installing a zebra crossing outside a property she owns. She says this has caused her injustice because of increased pollution, a loss of privacy and potentially a loss of rental income and a reduction in the sale price. The Council was not at fault. The crossing was part of a scheme to reduce air pollution in the town. The Council collaborated with the district council and consulted the public before deciding on the plan. Mrs C’s objections were considered by the committee which approved the scheme.