Archive has 157 results
-
Birmingham City Council (21 014 661)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 17-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice for not paying the charge to enter the Birmingham Clean Air Zone. The injustice caused to the complainant does not justify our involvement.
-
Nottinghamshire County Council (21 016 548)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 11-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to remove parking spaces at a station in order to improve access for a development approved by the local planning authority. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.
-
Transport for London (21 012 262)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 11-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Transport for London’s decision to refuse the complainant’s application for a resident’s discount for the congestion charge. This is because there is no evidence of fault affecting the decision.
-
London Borough of Enfield (21 016 342)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 07-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s implementation of CCTV traffic enforcement in Mr X’s area. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council sufficient to warrant an investigation.
-
Royal Borough of Greenwich (21 015 736)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 03-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a Freedom of Information request. This is because the Information Commissioners Office is better placed to investigate.
-
Transport for London (21 015 910)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 03-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice for not paying the London congestion zone charge. The complainant has suffered injustice that warrants our involvement.
-
East Riding of Yorkshire Council (21 015 321)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 01-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s highway improvements to a roundabout and speed limits near Mr X’s home. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.
-
Norfolk County Council (21 000 050)
Statement Not upheld Traffic management 25-Feb-2022
Summary: Mr G complained about the Council’s consultation for a traffic regulation order. He says there were several flaws in the Council’s process. The effect was they were excluded from the consultation process and now have a bus stop opposite their home. He also complains the bus company used the stop as a terminus, contrary to the order, and the Council refused to take enforcement action. The Ombudsman’s decision is there was no fault by the Council.
-
Hampshire County Council (21 015 160)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 17-Feb-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to introduce parking restrictions on a road to the rear of Mr X’s property. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.
-
London Borough of Waltham Forest (21 015 541)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 17-Feb-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about traffic calming measures. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify us investigating this complaint and the police are better placed to consider speeding in the area.