Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Disabled facilities grants archive 2020-2021


Archive has 46 results

  • Nottingham City Council (20 011 857)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled facilities grants 25-Mar-2021

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council's decision not to award a Disabled Facilities Grant and build a drive. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. In addition, the Council is still exploring the issue with the complainant.

  • Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council (20 002 685)

    Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 08-Mar-2021

    Summary: Fault by a Home Improvement Agency acting on behalf of the Council delayed Mr and Mrs X's request for a Disabled Facilities Grant to adapt their home for their disabled son by at least 18 months. The Council has agreed to apologise, make a financial payment, and take action to improve its services.

  • Uttlesford District Council (20 005 667)

    Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 25-Feb-2021

    Summary: Mrs and Mr C complained about the time it took the Council to realise her proposed extensions would be too expensive, and it should therefore pursue alternatives instead. This resulted in an unreasonable delay in providing her with a long-term solution in terms of her accommodation. We have upheld the complaint. The Council has agreed to apologise to Mrs and Mr C and pay her £7,000 for the significant distress and inconvenience these delays caused her.

  • London Borough of Newham (20 002 423)

    Statement Not upheld Disabled facilities grants 23-Feb-2021

    Summary: The Council has properly considered what is reasonable and practical to provide under a Disabled Facilities Grant. Mr C has not received adaptations he needs to his property to meet his adult social care needs, but that is due to a dispute over what is reasonable and practical rather than through any fault of the Council.

  • Staffordshire County Council (19 020 535)

    Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 23-Feb-2021

    Summary: Miss W says the Council failed to arrange for an occupational therapist to assess her son, which was necessary before they could ask the Council to provide an adaption to their home with a Disabled Facilities Grant. The Council is not at fault for this although it should have kept the situation under review as it received information from professionals. Miss W did not know what evidence the Council needed, which caused her time, trouble and distress. The Council is also at fault for failing to properly address Miss W's complaints.

  • City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (19 017 147)

    Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 17-Feb-2021

    Summary: The Ombudsman found fault on Mrs W's complaint about the Council failing to promptly process her application for a disabled facilities grant. The failure to include access at the start of the process caused about 3 months delay. The failure to include needed works identified at the start, was also fault. The agreed action remedies the injustice caused.

  • Durham County Council (19 009 078)

    Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 09-Feb-2021

    Summary: Miss B complains the Council has not completed adaptions to her home. She says the lack of adaptions has a significant impact on her quality of life. Miss B says the Council delayed in agreeing an adaption plan, has declined to provide additional funding and did not properly respond to her complaint. The Ombudsman finds fault in how the Council investigated this matter at stage two of its complaint procedure.

  • Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (19 017 796)

    Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 02-Feb-2021

    Summary: Mrs X complains about the Council's handling of a disabled facilities grant for adaptations to their home to meet the needs of her son. Mrs X was given no choice but to use a Home Improvement Agency which cost over £3,000, despite Mrs X having to manage the work. The Council needs to pay Mrs X half the money paid to the Home Improvement Agency to remedy the injustice caused to her.

  • London Borough of Waltham Forest (19 020 245)

    Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 26-Jan-2021

    Summary: Ms X complained about the Council's handling of a disabled facilities grant and related works to provide a bathroom adapted for the needs of her son, Y. She said the work was not completed and the work that was done did not meet Y's needs. The Council was at fault. It will apologise, pay Ms X £1,000 for the inconvenience caused, and take steps to put matters right.

  • London Borough of Hillingdon (20 000 568)

    Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 08-Jan-2021

    Summary: the complainant complains the Council delayed designing and completing adaptations to her home resulting in her sharing a room with one of her children for longer than necessary. The Council says the delay reflects some of the changes in design the complainant wanted. The Council also sought alternative housing for the complainant but without success. The Council recognised faults and offered a remedy. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted with fault and recommends a further remedy.