Archive has 516 results
-
Norfolk County Council (18 013 059)
Statement Upheld Planning applications 31-Mar-2020
Summary: Mr B has complained about the Council’s running of an agricultural site next to his home. The Ombudsman has no found fault on the part of the Council, aside from its delay in responding to his complaint, for which it has already apologised.
-
Wiltshire Council (19 010 798)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 31-Mar-2020
Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s decision to vary a planning condition that controls the use of the building next to his home. There was no evidence of fault in the way the Council made its decision.
-
Melton Borough Council (19 011 941)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 31-Mar-2020
Summary: There was no fault by the Council in a complaint which alleged fault with the Council’s decision to grant planning permission for a development as well as its handling of planning enforcement matters.
-
Tunbridge Wells Borough Council (19 013 507)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 31-Mar-2020
Summary: There was no fault by the Council in a complaint about its decision to grant planning permission for a development close to the complainant’s relative’s home in 2019.
-
Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council (19 016 660)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 31-Mar-2020
Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s decision to approve his neighbours’ planning application. The Ombudsman does not intend to investigate this complaint as it is late. And an investigation is unlikely to lead to a different outcome.
-
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (19 001 759)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 31-Mar-2020
Summary: Mr B complains about the way the Council handled his neighbour’s planning applications and its failure to take enforcement action. The Ombudsman finds no fault on the Council’s part.
-
Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council (19 009 008)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 31-Mar-2020
Summary: the complainant says the Council failed to properly consider an application for an extension near his home which affects his home and the character of the area. The Council says it considered all relevant policies and its case officer wrote a short report on the proposed minor development. The Ombudsman finds the Council decided the application having before it all relevant information including the complainant’s objections and therefore acted without fault.
-
Northumberland County Council (19 009 313)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 31-Mar-2020
Summary: There was no fault in how the Council reached its decision to grant planning permission for development near Mr X’s home.
-
Dover District Council (19 020 151)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 30-Mar-2020
Summary: Mr X complains that the Council threatened him with planning enforcement action relating to a property he owned. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because he had a right of appeal to a court and he commenced legal action against the Council.
-
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council (19 019 381)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 27-Mar-2020
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s consideration of and decision on a planning application for a property extension near his house. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council in how it dealt with the application to warrant an Ombudsman investigation.