Archive has 787 results
-
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 03-Feb-2020
Summary: There is no fault in the way the Council reached its decision to grant planning permission for new properties next to Miss X’s property. The Council cannot consider private rights to use or access land when granting or refusing planning permission.
-
Tewkesbury Borough Council (19 006 200)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 31-Jan-2020
Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to adequately consider the impact of noise from a busy road when granting planning permission for the development where he lives. He said he was seriously disturbed by traffic noise that has affected his sleep and mental health. The Council has agreed to check whether the developer complied with a planning condition about noise, so I have ended my investigation.
-
Isle of Wight Council (19 008 664)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 31-Jan-2020
Summary: Mrs B complains the Council granted planning permission for development of land which the planning applicant does not own, despite being aware of this. The Ombudsman finds no fault by the Council causing injustice to Mrs B.
-
South Gloucestershire Council (19 005 897)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 30-Jan-2020
Summary: Mrs B complains the Council approved development near to her home, without properly considering its impact on her amenity. The Ombudsman finds no fault by the Council in this matter.
-
Slough Borough Council (19 008 017)
Statement Upheld Planning applications 30-Jan-2020
Summary: The Council did not properly consider the impact a development close to Ms C’s home would have on Ms C’s amenity. It has agreed to consider a suitable remedy, once a live application has been decided.
-
Tewkesbury Borough Council (19 013 761)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 30-Jan-2020
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because the complainant has not been caused any significant injustice by the Council’s actions.
-
South Somerset District Council (19 014 501)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 30-Jan-2020
Summary: Mrs X complains about the Council’s decision to grant planning permission for a dwelling next door. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.
-
West Lindsey District Council (19 014 906)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 30-Jan-2020
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his neighbour’s planning application. This is because it is unlikely we would find fault affecting its decision.
-
Folkestone & Hythe District Council (19 006 077)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 29-Jan-2020
Summary: Miss B considers that there was fault in the way the Council consulted on and considered her neighbour’s planning application to extend their home. The Ombudsman has found no fault in the way the Council consulted on or considered the application, so we cannot question the merits of the Council’s decision to approve the application.
-
West Lancashire Borough Council (19 006 508)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 29-Jan-2020
Summary: Mr X complained the Council granted planning permission for a pet cremator near his home without considering all the correct information. There is no fault in the way the Council reached its decision and we have closed Mr X’s complaint.