Other archive 2019-2020


Archive has 79 results

  • PALS & Complaints NHS Buckinghamshire Clinical Commissioning Group (19 018 653)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 26-Mar-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsmen will not investigate Mr C's complaint about events from May to July 2018. The complaints are late and there are insufficient grounds to accept them now.

  • East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust (19 017 996)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 16-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr A complains Lancashire County Council has not referred him for a Disability Facilities Grant. I have declined to investigate this complaint as I have not found any indication of fault on the part of the Council and there is no more an investigation could achieve for Mr A.

  • Southampton City Clinical Commissioning Group (19 018 208)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 10-Mar-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsmen should not investigate this complaint because it is late. I have not seen sufficient reasons to accept it now.

  • Solent NHS Trust (19 018 208)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 10-Mar-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsmen should not investigate this complaint because it is late. I have not seen sufficient reasons to accept it now.

  • West Hampshire Clinical Commissioning Group (19 018 208)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 10-Mar-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsmen should not investigate this complaint because it is late. I have not seen sufficient reasons to accept it now.

  • The Priory Care Group (19 011 677)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 10-Feb-2020

    Summary: Mrs D complained about the care and support provided to her daughter, Miss E, in a supported living placement run by Priory Care Group and jointly funded by Hampshire County Council and a clinical commissioning group. Mrs D said the response from the provider was inadequate and she wanted disciplinary action taken against those individuals she held responsible for decline in her daughter's wellbeing. The Ombudsmen cannot add to the previous investigation completed by the authorities and cannot achieve the outcome Mrs D wants. For these reasons the Ombudsmen should not investigate the complaint.

  • Southend Clinical Commissioning Group (19 015 337)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 06-Feb-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsmen will not investigate Mrs X's complaint. The Ombudsmen consider Mrs X's complaint about events at Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust in 2017 is late, and we could not say the Trust should have detained Mr Y in 2017 and 2019. Also, the Ombudsmen do not consider there is a significant injustice to Mrs X to warrant an investigation of Southend Clinical Commissioning Group's continuing healthcare assessment of Mr Y.

  • NHS Devon CCG (19 006 761)

    Statement Not upheld Other 21-Jan-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsmen consider Livewell Southwest missed the opportunity to support Mrs K when her art therapy stopped because of staff sickness. This caused Mr and Mrs K distress which Livewell Southwest should put right. Also, Plymouth City Council should have properly considered Mrs K's respite request in May 2018. That caused Mrs K uncertainty. The Ombudsmen do not consider Livewell Southwest were at fault in the way it managed Mrs K's section 117 aftercare with a psychiatrist rather than a care coordinator.

  • Livewell Southwest (19 008 253)

    Statement Not upheld Other 16-Jan-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsmen found fault by the Council and Livewell Southwest with regards to their communication with the complainant about care charges. However, the Ombudsmen are satisfied this did not result in a significant injustice for the complainant.

  • HC-One Ltd (18 009 105)

    Statement Upheld Other 15-Jan-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsmen consider Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust's (the Trust) communication with Mr C about Mrs D's prognosis was poor which caused confusion and distress. Also, the Trust's lack of care planning for Mrs D on discharge to two care homes caused Mr C uncertainty. Trinity House Care Centre's diabetes care plan lacked detail and did not escalate Mrs D to a GP in a timely manner which caused Mr C distress at witnessing his mother suffer pain and distress. The Ombudsmen consider Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council's (the Council) safeguarding investigation and safeguarding adults review caused Mr C uncertainty and distress. The Council, the Trust and Summerhill Surgery's complaint handling compounded Mr C's distress.

Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.