Archive has 117 results
-
Kent County Council (18 017 171)
Statement Not upheld Safeguarding 12-Jun-2019
Summary: Mrs X complains about the way the Council investigated safeguarding concerns she raised regarding her adult daughter. She also complains about direct payments. The Ombudsman has discontinued the investigation to give the Council the opportunity to investigate and respond to the complaints.
-
Cheshire West & Chester Council (18 017 802)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 11-Jun-2019
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs A’s complaint about the Council’s failure to investigate care she received from her care provider under its responsibilities for safeguarding adults. This is because he could not add to the Council’s response or make a different finding even if he investigated.
-
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council (19 000 870)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 07-Jun-2019
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an alleged data breach. The Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider it.
-
Darlington Borough Council (18 013 683)
Statement Upheld Safeguarding 31-May-2019
Summary: Mrs Y complains the Council failed to take appropriate action in 2017 after she reported the alleged financial abuse of her father, Mr X. The Ombudsman finds the Council at fault for not conducting a full assessment of Mr X’s capacity after Mrs Y reported concerns. This caused distress to Mrs Y, which the Council has already proposed to remedy with a payment of £500. The Ombudsman finds this remedy is suitable and we do not recommend anything further.
-
Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council (18 004 419)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 24-May-2019
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr A’s complaint about the Council undertaking a safeguarding investigation, or its decision to consider applying to the Court of Protection for deputyship for his mother’s, Mrs B’s, finances. This is because there is no evidence of fault with the actions taken by the Council warranting investigation by the Ombudsman. Mr A can ask the Court of Protection to consider his application for deputyship for Mrs B’s finances.
-
Nottinghamshire County Council (18 016 607)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 23-May-2019
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about a safeguarding investigation carried out by the Council. This is because we could not add to its review of the investigation, and could not achieve the outcome the complainant wants.
-
West Sussex County Council (16 017 502)
Statement Upheld Safeguarding 21-May-2019
Summary: Mr B complained about the way the Council handled a Safeguarding Adult Review (SAR), following a serious injury sustained by his brother, Mr C, whilst in residential care. The SAR found significant fault in the Council’s safeguarding investigation. We find fault in the way the SAR report was publicised and the way in which it involved Mr B in the process. This caused Mr B a significant amount of time and trouble and distress pursuing the issues raised. The Council has agreed to apologise to Mr B and Mr C, pay Mr B £1000, tell us and Mr B what improvements it has made to its safeguarding investigation process and arrange a meeting with the agencies involved in the SAR as the SAB originally intended to do.
-
Norfolk County Council (18 015 769)
Statement Upheld Safeguarding 17-May-2019
Summary: There is evidence of fault in this complaint. The Council failed to properly investigate Mrs X’s complaint about a carers actions on the night her husband died. The Council also failed to give sufficient weight to the evidence Mrs X provided. This caused her significant distress.