Archive has 123 results
-
Northumberland County Council (17 012 868)
Statement Not upheld Domiciliary care 29-May-2019
Summary: Mr X complained that the Council failed to properly communicate with him and failed to investigate a safeguarding referral about his brother, Mr P. However, he has now decided to withdraw his complaint. The Council has taken action that he is content with and he feels his brother’s interests are now being properly addressed.
-
London Borough of Bromley (18 016 388)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Domiciliary care 29-May-2019
Summary: Mr X complained about the care provided by care agencies and the Council putting in an interim care package without telling him about it. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council and it is unlikely an investigation by us will lead to a different result.
-
Warwickshire County Council (18 018 970)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Domiciliary care 23-May-2019
Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the quality of domiciliary care for the complainant’s son. This is because the complaint is made late and is out of our jurisdiction.
-
Westminster City Council (18 013 814)
Statement Upheld Domiciliary care 20-May-2019
Summary: Mr X complains about poor homecare provided by Healthvision (UK) Ltd on the Council’s behalf, causing him distress. The Council and Healthvision (UK) Ltd accept there was some fault in some of the home visits. There was also a failure to keep daily record sheets and to respond to two emailed complaints. The Council will apologise for the failure to respond to the complaints and take whatever action is necessary to ensure daily records are kept. There was no fault in the other matters complained of.