Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Traffic management archive 2018-2019


Archive has 219 results

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 000 397)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 009 646)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 009 026)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 008 655)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 009 047)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 009 494)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 010 531)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 010 074)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 009 144)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 009 754)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.