Traffic management archive 2018-2019


Archive has 219 results

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 008 729)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 008 707)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 009 821)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 009 661)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 008 745)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 009 144)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 009 754)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • Slough Borough Council (18 014 445)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint that the Council has failed to stop his neighbours leaving their wheelie bins outside their home which reduces parking space. The Council has not caused Mr X an injustice.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 010 074)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 009 047)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.