Planning applications archive 2018-2019


Archive has 930 results

  • Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (18 006 324)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council wrongly granted planning permission for development. There is no evidence of fault by the Council causing the complainant injustice. The complainant can seek a remedy in court if he believes the Council has caused him financial loss.

  • London Borough of Ealing (18 007 340)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council did not properly consider his amenity before it approved a planning application for residential development near his home. Mr X says the development causes a significant loss of light to his home. There was no fault in the way the Council made its planning decision.

  • Coventry City Council (18 006 468)

    Statement Upheld Planning applications 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: Mr X complains the Council gave an inaccurate description of a development when it sent him a consultation, did not respond to his letters seeking clarification and did not properly assess the impact on his solar panels. The Ombudsman finds there was fault when the Council publicised the planning application with a factually wrong description. However, there is no evidence this caused any significant injustice to Mr X. Further, there was no fault in how the Council handled Mr X's letters of representation or in its conclusion the effect of the development on his solar panels was not a material planning consideration.

  • Sedgemoor District Council (18 012 901)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to consider the Neighbourhood Plan before making a planning decision. We should end our investigation as Mr X was not caused an injustice and it is unlikely that further investigation would result in a finding of fault.

  • Runnymede Borough Council (18 013 241)

    Statement Upheld Planning applications 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: Mr X has complained about the Council's decision to grant planning permission for a development near his home. There is some fault with how the Council has dealt with the planning application, but this has caused no injustice.

  • Breckland District Council (18 018 087)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the Council's consideration of a planning application. This is because the Council has refused the application. Therefore, the complainant has not suffered a significant personal injustice.

  • West Devon Borough Council (18 015 798)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 28-Mar-2019

    Summary: Mr C complains about the Council's consideration of an outline planning application which he says will result in a loss of outlook, wildlife and value to his property. The Ombudsman has ended his involvement as we cannot at this stage assess the extent of Mr C's injustice.

  • Telford & Wrekin Council (18 010 855)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 28-Mar-2019

    Summary: The Council acted without fault in its handling of planning applications and in its enforcement actions over an unauthorised gate. The Council has offered a remedy for faults it acknowledged in its complaints handling and has taken steps to improve its complaints processes, showing learning from the complaint.

  • Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (18 012 219)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 27-Mar-2019

    Summary: Mr X has complained about how the Council dealt with a planning application for a single storey extension. There is no evidence of fault by the Council.

  • North Warwickshire Borough Council (18 008 230)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 27-Mar-2019

    Summary: Mr C says the Council wrongly granted permissions for a care home near his house and failed to control a noise nuisance coming from the care home once built. The Council took professional decisions with which Mr C disagrees. It was not at fault.

Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.