Traffic management archive 2017-2018


Archive has 207 results

  • Aylesbury Vale District Council (17 018 377)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council enforcing parking controls on some land which he says is not public highway. The Ombudsman will not exercise his discretion to investigate this complaint which was received out of time. It was reasonable for Mr X to complain to the highway authority in 2015.

  • Leeds City Council (17 018 676)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council will not introduce a speed restriction and place signs which the complainant believes are necessary. We are unlikely to find fault in how the Council has responded to the complainant's concerns.

  • Ipswich Borough Council (17 018 693)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint about the Council's enforcement of parking restrictions. No worthwhile outcome would be achieved by an investigation and Mr X has not been caused significant personal injustice.

  • London Borough of Waltham Forest (17 013 585)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council's consultation on a Controlled Parking Zone affecting the streets where he lives. We have found that the Council correctly followed its consultation policy, considered equality impacts and used a Traffic Regulation Order. There was no fault in the Council's actions.

  • London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (16 019 413)

    Statement Upheld Traffic management 26-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman has not found fault in the Council's decision that Mr B and Mr C must go through an assessment if they want a personalised disabled parking space. However, the Council should have been clearer in its consultation what the effect of the controlled parking zone would be.

  • Transport for London (17 014 011)

    Statement Upheld Traffic management 22-Mar-2018

    Summary: Ms X complained of unreasonable delay by Transport for London in addressing a problem with motorists' use of a parking bay which impedes her access to her home. There was unreasonable delay by Transport for London. It agreed to remedy the injustice to Ms X by altering the markings of the bay and making a payment to reflect the distress she was caused.

  • Coventry City Council (17 016 312)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 21-Mar-2018

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council's lack of proper consultation when it introduced a parking permit scheme in his area. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council's part which has caused injustice to Mr X.

  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets (17 018 382)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 20-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the cost of a refund for a parking permit. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Birmingham City Council (17 018 041)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 20-Mar-2018

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council's failure to properly operate a bus gating system on the road where he lives. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council's part which would warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman has no authority to change a Traffic Regulation Order.

  • Selby District Council (17 018 269)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 20-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not consider Mr B's complaint about visibility splays which formed part of a 2014 planning application. This is because he has already investigated Mr B's complaint and Mr B has taken the Council to court.