Enforcement archive 2017-2018


Archive has 302 results

  • Cornwall Council (17 005 480)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: There is no evidence of fault in how the Council made it decision that an appropriate noise compliance assessment report had been submitted to discharge a planning condition for a wind turbine.

  • South Oxfordshire District Council (17 018 704)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint about the Council's handling of its enforcement case against him. Mr X has appealed against the enforcement notice and it is unlikely we could achieve anything for him by investigating the conduct of the council officer at the public inquiry.

  • Bath and North East Somerset Council (17 018 650)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs X's complaint about the Council's handling of a planning enforcement case. Mrs X has appealed against the Council's decision to refuse her planning application and can appeal any enforcement notice the Council issues for her alleged breach of planning control.

  • Brighton & Hove City Council (17 009 565)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: Mr R complains the Council failed to take enforcement action following activity by developers on land near his home. The Ombudsman has found evidence of one fault by the Council which did not cause an injustice. Overall it has acted in line with procedures. She has upheld the complaint, because of the one fault identified, and completed the investigation.

  • City Of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (17 016 330)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr and Mrs B's complaint about the Council's decision not to take enforcement action against a neighbour. Further investigation of the complaint is unlikely to find fault by the Council.

  • Coventry City Council (16 012 701)

    Statement Not upheld Enforcement 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: Mr X says the Council was at fault in its investigation of flooding of the road he lives in and that it has failed to take action to prevent future flooding. The Ombudsman has found no evidence of fault by the Council in these matters and for this reason he has ended his investigation of this complaint

  • Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (17 013 964)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms B's complaints the Council has failed to take enforcement action for non-compliance with planning conditions and is now considering a new planning application. Further investigation of the complaint is unlikely to find fault by the Council.

  • Braintree District Council (17 018 766)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 27-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint that the Council has not determined similar planning applications consistently. The Council's decisions on his neighbours' applications have not caused him significant injustice and if Mr X disputed its decision on his application it would have been reasonable for him to appeal.

  • Tewkesbury Borough Council (17 007 830)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 26-Mar-2018

    Summary: Mrs X complains the Council failed to protect her amenity after her neighbour built development in breach of the grant of planning approval. The Council has agreed to take action to remedy the complaint.

  • London Borough Of Brent (17 019 291)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 23-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Miss X's complaint about the Council's planning enforcement actions taken because she converted a property to flats and built an extension without planning permission. Miss X used her right of appeal to the Planning Inspector and the Ombudsman cannot therefore investigate.