Councillor conduct and standards archive 2017-2018


Archive has 104 results

  • Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council (17 011 902)

    Statement Not upheld Councillor conduct and standards 29-Mar-2018

    Summary: Mr and Mrs B complain about the Council Monitoring Officer's handling of their complaint about the conduct of a Parish Councillor. Any fault by the monitoring officer has not caused Mr and Mrs B a significant injustice. So, I have ended my investigation.

  • Birmingham City Council (17 018 322)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr B's complaint about the way the Council dealt with his code of conduct complaint about a councillor. This is because it is unlikely an investigation would identify fault.

  • Leeds City Council (17 012 215)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint about the actions of a Councillor and the Council's failure to investigate them. This is because the Councillor was not acting as a councillor at the time and her actions are not, therefore, within the Ombudsman's jurisdiction. There is no sign of significant fault in the way the Council handled the complaint. An investigation would not provide a different or better outcome for Mr X.

  • Winchester City Council (17 018 103)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 16-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint that the Council has delayed in dealing with his complaint about a breach of the councillor code of conduct. The Council has not caused Mr X significant injustice. The actions of the councillor and Mr X's allegation of misconduct in a public office are outside the Ombudsman's legal powers.

  • Hinckley & Bosworth Borough Council (17 019 181)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 09-Mar-2018

    Summary: Mr Y complains as a councillor and we cannot investigate as such complaints are outside our legal remit.

  • Derbyshire County Council (17 017 470)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 06-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs B's complaint. This is because we have not seen any evidence of fault in the way the Council dealt with her code of conduct complaint about a councillor.

  • Gloucestershire County Council (17 017 790)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 06-Mar-2018

    Summary: We will not investigate how the Council dealt with a complaint about a county councillor as the person complaining is not caused significant personal injustice.

  • North Kesteven District Council (17 017 902)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 06-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint about the Council refusing to investigate a councillor under its code of conduct for members. The Council is entitled not to investigate and has not caused Mr X an injustice by its decision.

  • Liverpool City Council (17 017 140)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 06-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr B's complaint that the Council failed to respond to his complaint about a councillor. This is because it is unlikely we would find fault.

  • London Borough of Croydon (17 016 303)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 26-Feb-2018

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms Y's complaint about how the Council dealt with her complaint about the conduct of the Chair at a planning meeting. This is because Ms Y is not caused a significant injustice.