Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Pollution archive 2017-2018

Archive has 29 results

  • Salford City Council (17 015 493)

    Statement Not upheld Pollution 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: There is no personal injustice to the complainant, in the Council's handling of reports about fly-tipping and vermin on an abandoned industrial site. For this reason, the Ombudsman has discontinued his investigation.

  • Halton Borough Council (17 011 393)

    Statement Upheld Pollution 27-Mar-2018

    Summary: There was fault when the Council failed to investigate a nuisance complaint about a waste site. There was no significant injustice to the complainant. This was because the Council did carry out other visits to monitor the site which found no statutory nuisance. The Environment Agency also confirmed the site was being operated in accordance with its permit.

  • Wakefield City Council (17 010 211)

    Statement Not upheld Pollution 26-Mar-2018

    Summary: Mr B says the Council misrepresented the truth about pollution levels from the M1. The Council was not at fault when it said air quality levels were improving based on its monitoring.

  • London Borough of Ealing (17 017 815)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Pollution 09-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council unreasonably issued Ms X with Fixed Penalty Notices for littering. This is because it is not our role to decide if someone has committed a criminal offence. Ms X can defend her case in the magistrate's court if she refuses to pay the penalty fine.

  • City of York Council (17 016 727)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Pollution 01-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr B's complaint about the conduct of a Council officer who attended his property. The Ombudsman has no power to take or recommend action against individual members of staff and could not reach a view on what happened during the site visit. And there is no significant personal injustice to Mr B arising from the claimed actions by the officer.

  • Lincoln City Council (17 010 058)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Pollution 20-Feb-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate how the Council dealt with the complainant's concerns about light form a building near his home. He is unlikely to found fault by the Council and a magistrates' court is better placed to deal with the matter.

  • Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council (17 010 760)

    Statement Not upheld Pollution 19-Feb-2018

    Summary: There was no fault in the way the Council responded to Mr X's reports of smoke and odour from a business. It considered his reports, diaries and video evidence. It visited the business after Mr X's reports of nuisance. It decided, having considered Mr X's evidence and its observations that the situation did not meet the threshold for statutory nuisance. This was a decision it was entitled to make.

  • London Borough of Waltham Forest (17 015 900)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Pollution 13-Feb-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about a fixed penalty notice for fly tipping. This is because the complainant could have raised a defence in court.

  • Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council (17 014 984)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Pollution 24-Jan-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr B's complaint that a council officer disclosed his name to a person he had reported to the Council for dumping rubbish. It is reasonable to expect Mr B to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner's Office and then to seek a remedy by going to court.

  • Hyndburn Borough Council (17 000 818)

    Statement Not upheld Pollution 21-Dec-2017

    Summary: Mr X complains the Council did not take meaningful action to address a statutory nuisance and failed to investigate properly. The Ombudsman finds no fault causing significant injustice in how the Council dealt with the statutory nuisance.