Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Antisocial behaviour archive 2017-2018


Archive has 72 results

  • London Borough of Newham (17 009 020)

    Statement Upheld Antisocial behaviour 28-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Council failed to respond to some of Ms B's telephone contacts about anti-social behaviour by a neighbour. The Council will apologise to Ms B for her frustration, time and trouble.

  • Stafford Borough Council (17 007 246)

    Statement Not upheld Antisocial behaviour 27-Mar-2018

    Summary: The complainant does not believe the Council has responded effectively to her neighbours' anti-social behaviour. The Council has responded in line with its statutory duty and is not at fault.

  • Nottingham City Council (17 018 461)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 16-Mar-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Miss X's complaint alleging she is suffering anti-social behaviour. This is because we are unlikely to find fault with the Council's response to her complaints.

  • South Holland District Council (17 005 427)

    Statement Upheld Antisocial behaviour 02-Mar-2018

    Summary: There is no fault in how the Council investigated Mr F's reports of noise nuisance and anti-social behaviour. There was some delay in the Council's responses to Mr F for which it has agreed to apologise.

  • Hertsmere Borough Council (17 003 477)

    Statement Not upheld Antisocial behaviour 28-Feb-2018

    Summary: The Council was not at fault for the way in which it dealt with a complaint about noise emanating from Mr C's house or for issuing a noise abatement notice against him.

  • Wakefield City Council (17 009 626)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 26-Feb-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr B and Ms B's complaints about the way the Council has investigated their complaints of smoke nuisance caused by a neighbour's wood burning stoves. Further consideration of the complaint is unlikely to find fault by the Council.

  • London Borough of Newham (17 009 965)

    Statement Upheld Antisocial behaviour 20-Feb-2018

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to respond to his complaint made in June 2017. The Council has agreed to investigate Mr X's complaint. This is suitable redress for Mr X. The Ombudsman has completed his investigation.

  • London Borough of Hillingdon (17 010 697)

    Statement Upheld Antisocial behaviour 12-Feb-2018

    Summary: The Ombudsman finds the Council was at fault in the way it handled an investigation into damage caused to a pavement. In recognition of the fault the Council has agreed to remove the invoice for this damage.

  • London Borough of Islington (16 009 291)

    Statement Upheld Antisocial behaviour 07-Feb-2018

    Summary: There were some delays by the Council in the way it responded to concerns about anti-social behaviour and in its initial response to a complaint about its approach to the problems. The Council will apologise to Mr X and take action to prevent future delays in its complaints process.

  • Boston Borough Council (17 003 190)

    Statement Not upheld Antisocial behaviour 30-Jan-2018

    Summary: Mr and Mrs Q complain the Council is discriminating against them by failing to properly investigate their complaints about their neighbours. There is no evidence of fault by the Council and we will not pursue the complaint any further.