Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Other archive 2016-2017

Archive has 57 results

  • Fenland District Council (16 009 104)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 31-Mar-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman does not have grounds to investigate this complaint about the Council's decision to issue a Certificate of Lawful Use in respect of business activities at a residential property, and its refusal to take enforcement action about an alleged planning breach. This is because there is no sign of fault by the Council to justify our intervention.

  • St Albans City Council (16 006 181)

    Statement Upheld Other 29-Mar-2017

    Summary: There was no fault in the way the Council considered the application by Mrs B's neighbour to extend his property, aside from the failure to note that a window was incorrectly drawn. But this has not caused Mrs B injustice.

  • Canterbury City Council (16 010 244)

    Statement Upheld Other 27-Mar-2017

    Summary: There was an element of fault in the way in which the Chair of the Planning Committee addressed Mr W. This did not cause Mr W significant injustice in itself, and made no difference to the Committee's decision. The Council was not otherwise at fault.

  • Cherwell District Council (15 018 029)

    Statement Not upheld Other 23-Mar-2017

    Summary: There was no fault in how the Council decided it had complied with obligations to enforce planning conditions connected with development of a railway line next to Mr X's riding stables. It commissioned an independent report and considered other relevant information before making that decision.

  • Cheshire East Council (16 016 605)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 21-Mar-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint arising from the Council's refusal of an application for a Certificate of Lawfulness. The Ombudsman could not consider a complaint about the decision itself because the complainant has a right of appeal to a government minister through the Planning Inspectorate. He will not investigate a complaint about service failures by the Council because these are not separable from the decision on the application.

  • Sedgemoor District Council (16 002 998)

    Statement Not upheld Other 02-Mar-2017

    Summary: The Council did not fail to make reasonable adjustments for the complainant to speak at committee meetings and at a site visit.

  • Herefordshire Council (16 016 485)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 01-Mar-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr B's complaint that the Council charged him a fee for his application to vary a planning condition. The Ombudsman would not find there was administrative fault in the way the Council reached its decision.

  • Wealden District Council (16 013 899)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 22-Feb-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council does not invite the complainant to meetings it holds with planning agents or provide information to him which it provides to agents. It is unlikely she would evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Sedgemoor District Council (16 006 674)

    Statement Not upheld Other 21-Feb-2017

    Summary: There was delay in an enforcement investigation but this has been dealt with in another investigation by the Ombudsman. There was no other fault in the actions of the officer complained about.

  • Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (16 015 488)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 21-Feb-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs B's complaint about a change in the Council's development plan. He could not now investigate effectively what happened more than 12 years ago.