Councillor conduct and standards archive 2016-2017


Archive has 94 results

  • Royal Borough of Greenwich (16 015 144)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 27-Mar-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate Ms M's complaint about the actions of a Councillor and the Council's failure to investigate them. The Councillor does not act on behalf of the Council when she acts as a member of a board of governors. The Council cannot therefore investigate her actions and neither can the Ombudsman.

  • London Borough of Camden (16 016 520)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 17-Mar-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate Mr X's complaint about the conduct of a local councillor. The complaint concerns the councillor's actions as a private individual in court.

  • Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council (16 012 033)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 17-Mar-2017

    Summary: Mr V complains about the Council's decision on his complaint about ward councillors and how long this has taken. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. There is no fault in the Council's decision making and the delay has not caused enough injustice to Mr V to justify an investigation.

  • Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council (16 017 364)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 17-Mar-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint from a councillor because it was not made by a member of the public.

  • Waverley Borough Council (16 010 531)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 15-Mar-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint as he is unlikely to find fault in the way the Council dealt with his code of conduct complaint about two councillors.

  • Hambleton District Council (16 017 674)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 13-Mar-2017

    Summary: We will not investigate the Council's refusal to investigate Mr Y's complaint about how his parish council has set its precept for 2017/18. This is because Mr Y is not caused significant injustice from the Council's decision; it is unlikely the Council has acted with fault; and the parish council's decision to raise the precept is outside our legal remit

  • Salford City Council (16 004 420)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 08-Mar-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate how the Council has dealt with complainant's concerns about the actions of a councillor. It is unlikely he would find the complainant had been caused injustice which justifies his involvement.

  • Tendring District Council (16 017 103)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 06-Mar-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint about the actions of a councillor who was not acting in an administrative role.

  • Rushcliffe Borough Council (16 017 679)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 03-Mar-2017

    Summary: We cannot investigate Mr Y's complaint about how his parish council is run. Mr Y is a member of the parish council and does not complain as a member of the public. Mr Y's complaint is therefore outside our legal remit.

  • Sedgemoor District Council (16 016 205)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 02-Mar-2017

    Summary: Mr & Mrs X's complain the Council has refused to carry out a formal investigation into their complaint that a parish councillor breached the parish council's code of conduct. The Ombudsman does not intend to investigate this as it is unlikely we will find fault in the way the Council considered their complaint.

;