Traffic management archive 2015-2016


Archive has 147 results

  • Bedford Borough Council (15 018 465)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 21-Mar-2016

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council's refusal to grant further parking permits for his business. The Council says it is not appropriate to issue further permits. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. There is insufficient evidence of any fault by the Council was has caused injustice to Mr X.

  • Essex County Council (15 019 236)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 21-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr E's complaint about the Council's failure to remove out of date road signs in a timely manner. This is because the matter has not caused Mr E a significant personal injustice which would merit an investigation. It is also unlikely an investigation would add to the response already provided by the Council.

  • Transport for London (15 018 695)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 16-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about enforcement of a congestion charge penalty as it is outside her jurisdiction. The complainant had the right to appeal to a statutory tribunal if he believed the penalty was wrongly issued and to a court if something had gone wrong in the enforcement process.

  • Transport for London (15 018 508)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 10-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about a parking penalty issued in respect of a leased vehicle. Any injustice to the complainant has not been directly caused by fault by Transport for London.

  • Dorset County Council (15 018 397)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 09-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr D's complaint of fault in the procedure leading to the Council bringing in a Traffic Regulation Order. The consequent reduction of the speed limit on a section of road does not cause enough injustice to Mr D to justify an investigation into the complaint.

  • Northamptonshire County Council (15 018 501)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 04-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr B's complaint because the Council's consultation process was not so inadequate as to be maladministration.

  • Halton Borough Council (15 015 143)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 03-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr B's complaint that a speed limit is not clearly signed. This is because Mr B has not suffered an injustice because of the alleged fault by the Council.

  • Norfolk County Council (15 009 677)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 02-Mar-2016

    Summary: There is no fault in how the Council has looked into making a traffic regulation order on a road near Mr X's property.

  • Transport for London (15 018 351)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 02-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about penalty charge notices issued by Transport for London. The complainant had a right of appeal against the notices and can ask a court to restore that right.

  • Transport for London (15 017 999)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 29-Feb-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice. The complainant had a right of appeal to a tribunal and can ask a court to restore that right.