Other archive 2015-2016


Archive has 124 results

  • Newark & Sherwood District Council (15 019 019)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 30-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr A's complaint about the Council's response to damage to a hedge and trees in a conservation area. Part of his complaint is late and there are no good reasons he could not have made it to the Ombudsman sooner. The Council should have a chance to investigate and respond to more recent concerns before the Ombudsman considers them.

  • Wycombe District Council (15 018 886)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 22-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr A's complaint about the Council's actions regarding the new classification of his property as being in a high flood risk area. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault with the Council's actions to warrant an investigation.

  • Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council (15 018 140)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 17-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the Council issuing two spot fines. Mrs X can pay the fine or defend herself in court.

  • London Borough of Ealing (15 018 483)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 16-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council dealt with a complaint relating to an abandoned car. This is because there is no sign that fault by the Council has caused the complainant an injustice to warrant the Ombudsman's involvement.

  • Bournemouth Borough Council (15 015 169)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 16-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr B's complaint about dog waste bins. There is not enough evidence of fault or of an injustice to Mr B to warrant an investigation.

  • London Borough of Lambeth (15 013 166)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 15-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr B's complaint because there is no evidence of fault in the way the Council investigated the concerns he reported. Even if there was evidence of fault, it is not possible for the Ombudsman to say this was the cause of Mr B losing his job.

  • North Hertfordshire District Council (15 014 030)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 14-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not pursue this complaint about the Council's response to a complaint about dog fouling as no worthwhile outcome would be achieved by an investigation.

  • Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (15 019 115)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 14-Mar-2016

    Summary: Mr J complains the Council has not taken action to stop light pollution from his neighbour's garden. The Ombudsman will not investigatie this complaint as the Council has no power to deal with nuisance caused by reflected sunlight.

  • London Borough of Ealing (15 008 550)

    Statement Not upheld Other 11-Mar-2016

    Summary: The Ombudsman has not upheld the complaint as the Council correctly investigated concerns of rodent activity and fly tipping.

  • Thanet District Council (15 012 814)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 11-Mar-2016

    Summary: Mr and Mrs X say the Council unreasonably served them with a noise abatement notice due to the barking of their dogs. The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint because Mr and Mrs X took legal action against the Council.