Archive has 1613 results
-
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (21 017 079)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 21-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s planning application. This is because Mr X had appeal rights to the Planning Inspectorate which we would reasonably have expected him to have used.
-
Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council (21 017 314)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X and Mrs Y’s complaint about the Council’s grant of planning permission for a new dwelling in 2018 because the complaint is late. We will not investigate their more recent enforcement issue relating to the same development as the matter does not cause them significant injustice.
-
Tendring District Council (21 017 431)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions relating to a planning application in the village where the complainant lives. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant our involvement. Nor do we consider the complainant has suffered significant, personal injustice.
-
Dover District Council (21 017 445)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 21-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to grant planning permission for alterations to a building near Ms X’s home. This is because there is no evidence of fault in the way the Council reached its decision.
-
Mole Valley District Council (21 017 462)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 21-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions following reports of breaches of planning control. From the information we have seen there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.
-
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 18-Mar-2022
Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s decision to grant planning permission for two dwellings next to his property. We have not found the Council to be at fault. It considered Mr X’s objections to the application when granting permission. As there was no fault in the process, we cannot question the merits of the Council's decision.
-
Vale of White Horse District Council (21 006 970)
Statement Not upheld Other 18-Mar-2022
Summary: There was no fault in the Council’s handling of a planning and environmental health matter concerning a village shop and café. The Council did not intend to prevent the café serving hot food and so it is not fault that the planning permission allows this. The Council has also given adequate reasons why it does not consider the café is causing a statutory odour nuisance. For this reason, we have completed our investigation.
-
Leeds City Council (21 017 292)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 18-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application or a possible breach of planning control. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.
-
Brentwood Borough Council (21 017 396)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 18-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his neighbour’s planning application in 2019. This is because the complaint is late.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Building control 18-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of a building control matter. This is because we could not achieve any worthwhile outcome for her.