COVID-19 archive 2020-2021


Archive has 6 results

  • Salford City Council (20 011 388)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Covid-19 19-Mar-2021

    Summary: We shall not currently investigate Mrs X’s complaint about her late father’s care. This is because the Council is still investigating a related safeguarding complaint. Mrs X can come back to us once the Council has dealt with that matter.

  • Devon County Council (20 002 941)

    Statement Upheld Covid-19 18-Mar-2021

    Summary: Mr X complains the Council and its care provider, Agency Assistance, failed to deal properly with his return home on 20 April 2020, resulting in him being asked to pay for the Care Workers’ gloves and being told he would have to go back to a care home if he did not agree to pay. The Council did not deal properly with Mr X’s concerns, putting him to the time and trouble of pursuing his complaint. It needs to apologise and pay financial redress.

  • Leicestershire County Council (20 007 059)

    Statement Upheld Covid-19 17-Mar-2021

    Summary: Mrs X complains about the Council’s handling of safeguarding concerns relating to the care home her son, Mr Y, lives in. Officers failed to do a risk assessment before visiting the care home, which could have put Mr Y at risk of harm. The Council needs to apologise for the distress it caused Mr Y.

  • Foxholes Nursing Home Limited (20 001 450)

    Statement Upheld Covid-19 03-Mar-2021

    Summary: Mr D complains on behalf of his late mother that there was a delay in providing pain medication at the end of her life, causing significant distress and pain. We have found fault causing injustice. The organisations have accepted our recommendations. We have therefore completed our investigation.

  • Milton Keynes Council (20 001 041)

    Statement Upheld Covid-19 01-Mar-2021

    Summary: Mr X complains the Council has failed to meet his son’s care needs since shortly after the country went into lockdown because of COVID-19. The Council was at fault for telling Mr X it would be able to reinstate his son’s pre-COVID-19 respite care when that was not possible. The Council needs to apologise and recognise the lack of trust this caused.

  • Regal Care Trading Ltd (20 002 828)

    Statement Upheld Covid-19 25-Feb-2021

    Summary: Mrs X, complains Blenheim Care Home failed to look after her father, Mr Y, properly, resulting in him spending time in hospital. Blenheim Care Home was ill equipped to deal with the demands arising from COVID-19. It failed to meet Mr Y’s needs or identify the fact he was unwell. Regal Care needs to apologise to Mrs X and pay financial redress to Mr Y.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings