Assessment and care plan archive 2020-2021


Archive has 53 results

  • North Yorkshire County Council (20 005 672)

    Statement Not upheld Assessment and care plan 17-Mar-2021

    Summary: We have not found fault with the way the Council carried out a financial assessment to decide Mr B’s eligibility for funding.

  • West Berkshire Council (20 005 738)

    Statement Not upheld Assessment and care plan 17-Mar-2021

    Summary: Mrs X complains the Council has failed to deal properly with Mrs Y’s financial assessment (leaving her to fund her own care) and failed to consider whether she should be referred for a full assessment for NHS Continuing Healthcare. We have discontinued the investigation as the Council has withdrawn its financial assessment so it can reconsider its decision. Mrs Y’s family has now applied for NHS Continuing Healthcare.

  • Kent County Council (20 006 958)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Assessment and care plan 16-Mar-2021

    Summary: The Ombudsmen have decided not to investigate a complaint about mental health care being transferred from an NHS Trust to a Council without telling the family. This is because although there appears to have been fault, this has been acknowledged and the organisations have already taken action to put these right. We are therefore unlikely to achieve more by investigating.

  • Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council (20 008 689)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Assessment and care plan 16-Mar-2021

    Summary: Mrs X complained on behalf of her brother, Mr Y, about his care assessment and care provided by the Council. Mrs X said that Mr Y was coming to physical harm because of this. We will not investigate this complaint because there is a more appropriate person to represent Mr Y.

  • Northumberland County Council (20 007 684)

    Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 15-Mar-2021

    Summary: We upheld some of Mr X’s complaints about a council’s involvement with his mother Mrs Y when she went into a care home. There was a failure to signpost Mrs Y to independent financial advice and a failure to carry out a social care assessment. And the Council’s complaint response contained unhelpful, irrelevant detail. The Council will apologise for the avoidable distress to Mr X.

  • Norfolk County Council (20 009 935)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Assessment and care plan 12-Mar-2021

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s failure to communicate with him about his mother’s care. We will not investigate the complaint because it is unlikely we would find fault.

  • Brighton & Hove City Council (19 012 945)

    Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 10-Mar-2021

    Summary: Mr C complained about the way in which the Council arranged his mother’s placement, and how it carried out two safeguarding enquiries. He was also unhappy with aspects of the Council’s financial assessment and a delay in terminating his parent’s tenancy, which caused him distress. We found fault with the way the Council carried out the safeguarding enquiries and caused a delay in terminating the tenancy. The Council has agreed to apologise to Mr C and pay a financial remedy for the distress he experienced.

  • Lancashire County Council (20 011 597)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Assessment and care plan 10-Mar-2021

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms C’s late complaint about the actions of the Council in 2018 and its decision to stop her care package in 2019. This is because Ms C could have come to us sooner if she was unhappy with the Council’s decision not to provide her with care.

  • Nottinghamshire County Council (19 015 380)

    Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 10-Mar-2021

    Summary: We upheld one of Mr X’s complaints. There was poor communication by the Council because it did not write to him to say it was commissioning an agency to do his care after stopping his direct payment. This caused Mr X avoidable distress for which the Council will apologise. There was no fault in transferring Mr X’s case from the mental health to adult social care team and no evidence a social worker verbally attacked one of Mr X’s personal assistants.

  • Sheffield City Council (19 015 370)

    Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 08-Mar-2021

    Summary: The Ombudsmen find there was an extensive avoidable delay in the Council assessing two young adults’ needs and producing a support plan for their care at home. This situation caused their mother significant avoidable stress which is an injustice. The Council has agreed to apologise, make a payment to recognise the injustice and to take steps to learn from the case and prevent recurrences.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings