Service improvements

London Borough of Croydon

Showing service improvements between 1 April 2022 and 31 March 2023

Find out more about service improvements

When we find fault, we can recommend improvements to systems and processes where they haven’t worked properly, so that others do not suffer from these same problems in future. Common examples are policy changes; procedural reviews; and staff training. Service improvements from decisions are published for 5 years and those from reports are published for 10 years.

Showing 1 - 10 of 29 cases with service improvements

Export results (CSV)

Downloads the current filtered list of service improvement decisions for London Borough of Croydon as a CSV file.

  • London Borough of Croydon (22 013 072)

    Category: Housing Date: 22-Mar-2023

    Summary

    Miss X complained the Council refused to accept her application to join the housing register to relieve her homelessness. The Council was at fault for delays in deciding her housing register application and for failing to carry out a review of her homelessness. The Council has agreed to apologise to Miss X, pay her £200 to acknowledge the frustration this caused and review her application. It has also agreed to review its procedures to prevent such delays in future.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to remind officers of the need to fully explore local connections and an individual’s circumstances in reaching a decision on their homelessness application, and to action requests for a review of their decisions.The Council has agreed to review its procedures to ensure there are no significant delays in reaching decisions on housing register applications.

  • London Borough of Croydon (22 009 191)

    Category: Children's care services Date: 21-Nov-2022

    Summary

    The complainant’s (Mr Y) representative (Advice Centre) said the Council failed by refusing to investigate Mr Y’s out-of-time complaint at stage two of its children’s complaint procedure. We found fault in the way the Council dealt with Mr Y’s complaint. This caused him injustice. The Council agreed to apologise, consider Mr Y’s complaint at stage two and provide staff training.

    Service improvements

    The Council will provide training for its staff dealing with the Children's Services complaints on the criteria to be applied when dealing with late complaints contained in the guidance 'Getting the best from complaints'. The Council will let us know when this training has been completed.

  • London Borough of Croydon (22 005 978)

    Category: Adult care services Date: 22-Dec-2022

    Summary

    Mrs X complained the Council failed to ensure a care package was in place for her husband, Mr X’s hospital discharge. She also complained about the Council’s delay in responding to her requests for direct payments and respite care and failing to correctly reassess Mr X’s finances. We find fault by the Council. This caused significant stress and uncertainty to Mr and Mrs X. To address the injustice caused by fault, the Council has agreed to apologise, make a symbolic payment and remind staff of the relevant guidance.

    Service improvements

    Issue written reminders to relevant staff to ensure they are aware of: Point 12.22 of the care and support statutory guidance which says in all cases, the consideration of the request for direct payments should be concluded in as timely a manner as possible.

  • London Borough of Croydon (22 004 880)

    Category: Housing Date: 16-Dec-2022

    Summary

    Miss X complained the Council wrongly assessed her priority for social housing. There was fault in how the Council decided about Miss X’s housing priority and how it communicated with her. While this did not affect Miss X’s priority, it did cause her avoidable frustration, worry, time and trouble for which the Council agreed to apologise and pay her a financial remedy. The Council also agreed to review how it decides about medical priority.

    Service improvements

    The Council agreed to review the the information and guidance it provides to applicants and medical professionals about evidence for housing applications. It should ensure that the information does not discourage applicants and professionals from providing relevant information about the effects of health problems or disabilities for professionals who know them well.The Council agreed to review the requirements it places on its medical advisers to ensure the advice provided for housing allocation priority contains sufficient explanation of how the recommendation was reached to allow housing staff to fully understand the advice and make their own decision about priority.The Council agreed to remind its housing allocations staff that: all decisions about medical priority should be made by the Council, not by the Council's medical advisers; and while they can take into account any recommendations made by the Council's medical advisers, they should not give this any special weight, must also take into account all evidence provided by applicants and resolve any conflicts of evidence (including with the medical adviser’s recommendation) when making decisions.The Council agreed to review the resources it assigns to its housing allocations team to ensure it has sufficient staff to respond to applications and queries from applicants within a reasonable period of time.

  • London Borough of Croydon (22 004 658)

    Category: Environment and regulation Date: 21-Nov-2022

    Summary

    Miss X complained the Council failed to follow proper process in considering her request for a Community Trigger. There were failings in the Community Trigger process which amount to fault. This fault has caused Miss X an injustice.

    Service improvements

    The Council has also agreed to review the local community trigger procedure, in conjunction with the relevant local agencies, to ensure it is in line with the statutory community trigger guidance. This should include providing timeframes for the review process; the need to consider inviting complaints/ a representative to review meetings and how this consideration should be evidence; and provide an appeal process.

  • London Borough of Croydon (22 004 342)

    Category: Housing Date: 23-Jan-2023

    Summary

    Miss D complained the Council delayed in deciding if it owed the main housing duty to her when she became homeless and that it placed her in unsuitable accommodation. We upheld complaints about these matters as well as finding poor complaint handling by the Council. These faults caused injustice to Miss D including that of living in unsuitable accommodation for three years. The Council accepts these findings and has agreed action set out at the end of this statement to remedy that injustice.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed it will ensure it has a process to identify and review cases where a decision on whether it owes the full housing duty are outstanding for more than three months to include management oversight and the encouragement of action plans to resolve whatever outstanding inquiries are delaying such a decision. This is to avoid lengthy delays, well in excess of Government guidance, in completing inquiries into whether it owes such a duty.The Council agreed to ensure it has a process to cover cases where homeless households are in need of a change of emergency or temporary accommodation because of its unsuitability. While the Council will face shortages of supply and budgetary pressures it should still be seeking to meet its statutory duties and have a way of systematically prioritising and reviewing such cases. This is to ensure there is not drift once it has identified a need to change such accommodation.The Council agreed to ensure that it had a process to identify complaints made about its housing services that have exceeded timescales for a reply under its corporate complaints procedure. This should include identifying who has oversight of such cases and ways for escalating concerns about non-response to senior managers. This followed a failure by the Council to reply to a complaint in this case for over eight months.

  • London Borough of Croydon (22 004 078)

    Category: Children's care services Date: 23-Oct-2022

    Summary

    The Council was at fault for its poor communication with Mr and Mrs X during the process of de-registering them as foster carers. It also failed to signpost them to a fostering support service and unnecessarily delayed in coming to its final decision on de-registration. However the Council was not at fault for not referring Mr and Mrs X’s appeal to the Independent Review Mechanism (IRM) as Mr X did not request this when given the opportunity. In recognition of the injustice caused by these faults, the Council has agreed to pay Mr and Mrs X £200 and said it will provide evidence of service improvements it has carried out.

    Service improvements

    The Council has agreed to provide us with evidence of what action it has now put in place to ensure it:acts on written representations from foster parents;informs foster parents of the outcome of its review panels; andfollows its own policy on signposting foster parents to relevant fostering support when they are the subject of investigations.

  • London Borough of Croydon (22 003 832)

    Category: Children's care services Date: 19-Oct-2022

    Summary

    Ms Y complains the Council failed to consider whether her family’s housing conditions meant any of her children were ‘in need’ (under Section 17 of the Children Act 1989). We found fault by the Council, which meant Ms Y missed out on the Council carrying out Child in Need assessments for her children. To remedy this, the Council has agreed to: apologise to Ms Y, make her a payment, and carry out the assessment for her youngest child. The Council has also agreed to make several service improvements.

    Service improvements

    the Council has also agreed to circulate a reminder to relevant staff of its duties under Section 17 of the Children Act 1989 and the circumstances when a Child in Need Assessment should be carried out, including where the individual affected has accessed the legal protocol for housing disrepair claims;the Council has also agreed to review its guidance to staff on handling complaints where the complainant is accessing the legal protocol for housing disrepair claims. The Council should make sure it is clear to staff when complaints about children’s social care services should be treated as separable from the legal protocol. This should make specific reference to the circumstances when children’s social care services complaints should be put through the statutory complaints process;the Council has also agreed to circulate a reminder to relevant staff that children’s social care services complaints that fall under the statutory complaints process should be treated as separable from housing disrepair claims. Those complaints that have completed the statutory complaints procedure may be considered by the Ombudsman if the complainant remains unhappy.

  • London Borough of Croydon (22 002 258)

    Category: Education Date: 13-Jan-2023

    Summary

    There was delay and fault in the way an EHC needs assessment was carried out and a delay in putting s.19 education in place. This caused unnecessary distress, time and trouble, some loss of education and uncertainty. The Council will apologise, make a remedy payment and carry out service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council will provide guidance to staff about the timeframe for carrying out an Education, Health and Care Needs Assessment when ordered by a Tribunal; gathering advice and discussing this with parents; and seeking social care advice as part of every Education, Health and Care Needs Assessment.The Council will review procedures for children unable to attend school due to medical needs to ensure medical advice is obtained to support decisions about the amount and type of alternative education to provide, including special education provision. The Council will also keep provision under review.The Council will ensure statutory timescales for phase transfers for children with Education, Health and Care plans are met.

  • London Borough of Croydon (22 002 241)

    Category: Education Date: 02-Dec-2022

    Summary

    Miss X complained the Council failed to provide Occupational Therapy (OT) provision in line with her son, F’s, Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan between December 2021 and May 2022. The Council failed to deliver F’s OT provision during this period which was fault. It agreed to pay Miss X £1000 to recognise the impact the loss of OT provision had on F. It also agreed to refund her the cost of the private OT assessment she commissioned during the EHC assessment process and carry out service improvements.

    Service improvements

    The Council agreed to remind relevant staff that where NHS Occupational Therapy advice is sought during the Education, Health and Care assessment process and that advice is delayed, to consider obtaining advice from private occupational therapists or asking other professionals to cover the issue in their reports.The Council agreed to consider whether to review its partnership and commissioning arrangements with health bodies to ensure advice requested as part of the Education, Health and Care assessment is received within six weeks of the advice request.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings