Traffic management


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Portsmouth City Council (18 012 755)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 13-May-2019

    Summary: Mr Y complained about how the Council decided to implement two controlled parking zones in his area. We have not found fault in the Council's decision-making process.

  • Torbay Council (18 012 881)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 30-Apr-2019

    Summary: Miss X complains the Council has not taken her concerns about the need for double yellow lines or other road safety measures outside her house seriously. Ombudsman found no fault in the Council's decision-making process, which is in line with its longstanding policy.

  • Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (18 011 806)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 10-Apr-2019

    Summary: Mrs X complained on behalf of herself and other residents about the way the Council consulted on a scheme to introduce a new road layout near to where she lives and about the way the Council dealt with her complaints. There was no fault in the Council's actions.

  • Royal Borough of Greenwich (18 007 539)

    Statement Upheld Traffic management 08-Apr-2019

    Summary: Ms X complains the Council has failed to provide the agreed remedy for a previous complaint to the Ombudsman and has delayed in providing her with a companion badge. There is no evidence of fault in the way the Council has attempted to carry out an OT assessment. But the failure to issue a companion badge does amount to fault and has caused Ms X an injustice, in the form of unnecessary distress, frustration and inconvenience.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 010 531)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 009 661)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 009 754)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 008 729)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 008 745)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.

  • London Borough of Croydon (18 008 707)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 29-Mar-2019

    Summary: The complainant says the Council failed to properly consider all relevant evidence and information when deciding to make a Traffic Management Order leading to an unacceptable increase in traffic on their road. The Council says it followed regulations, consulted residents in the wider area and considered all relevant information before making the Traffic Management Order. The Ombudsman finds the Council acted without fault in making the Traffic Management Order and that the alleged failings did not alter the final decision.