Traffic management


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Transport for London (23 013 614)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 12-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about Transport for London’s policy for discounts and exemptions to charges for its ultra-low emission zone, which he believes is discriminatory. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by Transport for London. The evidence shows the authority had due regard to its duties and obligations under the Equality Act 2010 and only the courts can determine whether the policy is discriminatory.

  • London Borough of Haringey (23 014 517)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 08-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to provide information related to a consultation which had been requested by Mr X before the end of the consultation period. This is because an investigation is unlikely to add to that already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.

  • City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (23 015 094)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 08-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to remove the complainant’s Clean Air Zone exemption. This is because we are unlikely to find fault by the Council.

  • Westmorland and Furness Council (23 015 164)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 08-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision that it will not provide a loading bay outside his business premises. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

  • Shropshire Council (23 014 916)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 07-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s intention to proceed with a local infrastructure project without putting in place improvements to the existing road network which Mr X believes are required. This is because it is unlikely we could achieve any worthwhile outcome for Mr X by investigating at this stage.

  • Leeds City Council (23 013 154)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 06-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to paint double yellow lines outside the complainant’s home. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. The complainant confirms the yellow lines have now been installed. Further investigation would not lead to a different outcome

  • Essex County Council (23 008 160)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 05-Feb-2024

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to plan and coordinate roadworks in his area which led to multiple closures and temporary traffic lights in the same area. I ended this investigation as there was insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s actions and we cannot achieve the outcome Mr X wants.

  • London Borough of Merton (23 014 958)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 05-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s introduction of a discretionary scrappage scheme for non-compliant vehicles. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

  • Transport for London (23 014 889)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 05-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about wrongful charges made by Transport for London for driving in the ultra-low emission zone. This is because the amount of the charges is only £25 and this is not significant enough to warrant investigation.

  • City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (23 014 662)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 01-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about parking restrictions. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings