What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Cornwall Council (25 029 041)

Category : Transport and highways > Rights of way

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to assess or repair a damaged boundary wall. It would be reasonable for Miss X to seek a remedy in court.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Council refused to assess or consider repairs to a boundary wall. Miss X said the Council constructed the wall during its previous ownership of the property.
  2. Miss X also complained the Council refused to consider her complaint.
  3. Miss X said this caused uncertainty and distress about the safety of the wall.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X owns a property where a boundary wall runs beside a footpath.
  2. Miss X said the Council constructed the boundary wall when it owned the property. Miss X said the title deed says the Council retained control of the design and form of boundary structures.
  3. Miss X said the boundary wall has cracks and showed signs of subsidence. She asked the Council to consider whether the defects were because of the Council’s historic work. Miss X said the title deed clause is relevant here when considering responsibility for structural or design defects.
  4. This is a contractual issue which the Ombudsman cannot decide. Miss X’s concerns should be raised with a solicitor for an interpretation of the title deed. Failing this, Miss X could take the matter to court.
  5. It would be reasonable to expect Miss X to do this because a court can decide whether the Council is responsible for any works or defects.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it would be reasonable for Miss X to seek a remedy in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings