South Kesteven District Council (24 006 910)

Category : Transport and highways > Rights of way

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a right of way as the courts are better placed to consider the issues complained about.

The complaint

  1. Mrs Y complained the Council has failed to resolve an access dispute before selling the adjoining council property.
  2. Mrs Y has said this has led to a breakdown in the relationship with the neighbours who have been trespassing on her land. Mrs Y says this has caused her and her husband distress and worry and they have sought advice from a solicitor costing them over £4,000.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mrs Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council previously owned the property which adjoins Mrs Y’s home. The Council then sold the property to a third party, who is now Mrs Y’s neighbour. The route of an access to a footpath have been in dispute. This has resulting in allegations of trespass onto Mrs Y’s property by the neighbour.
  2. Mrs Y believes the Council should have resolved the access dispute before it sold the adjoining property. She says as a result she spent over £4,000 on legal fees so far, without a resolution to the issue, which she considers the Council’s responsibility to refund her for. This would be a potential negligence claim for damages.
  3. We are not able to decide liability or award damages. Consequently, any claim for damages, such as costs for legal advice, which Mrs Y considers the Council to be responsible for, are matters more appropriately dealt with by the courts. We will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs Y’s complaint because the courts are better placed to consider the issues complained about.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings